GPT-4o vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Compare two of the most advanced AI models available today. Find out which one suits your needs better.
Quick Overview
GPT-4o
by OpenAI
GPT-4o ('o' for 'omni') is OpenAI's flagship multimodal model, designed for real-time, human-like interaction across text, audio, and vision.
Modalities
Best For
Real-time voice assistants, customer service bots, and applications requiring fast visual understanding.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
by Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is Anthropic's fastest and most cost-effective model, outperforming their previous top-tier model, Opus, on many benchmarks. It's designed for high-throughput enterprise workloads.
Modalities
Best For
Code generation, data analysis, content creation, and enterprise-scale AI applications.
Performance Benchmarks
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)
GPQA (Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A)
HumanEval (Code Generation)
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-4o | Claude 3.5 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128k tokens | 200k tokens |
| Real-time Voice | ||
| Interactive Code Artifacts | ||
| Open Source | ||
| API Cost (Input) | $5/1M tokens | $3/1M tokens |
| API Cost (Output) | $15/1M tokens | $15/1M tokens |
Strengths & Weaknesses
GPT-4o
Strengths
- •Extremely fast response times
- •State-of-the-art multimodal capabilities
- •Highly conversational and natural interaction
- •Free tier access is very generous
Weaknesses
- •Reasoning can sometimes be shallower than GPT-4 Turbo
- •Rate limits on the free tier can be restrictive for heavy users
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Strengths
- •Top-tier intelligence at high speed
- •Excellent for coding and technical tasks
- •Large 200K context window
- •Cost-effective for its performance level
Weaknesses
- •Fewer multimodal features compared to GPT-4o (no audio/video)
- •Less known brand name compared to OpenAI's GPT
What Users Are Saying
GPT-4o Users
“Users widely praise GPT-4o for its conversational speed and impressive vision capabilities, though some note it can occasionally be less detailed in reasoning tasks compared to its predecessor, GPT-4 Turbo.”
Claude 3.5 Sonnet Users
“Developers and businesses praise Sonnet 3.5 for its incredible speed and intelligence, particularly in coding and complex reasoning tasks. Its 'Artifacts' feature for interactive code execution is a standout.”
Final Verdict
For developers needing raw coding power and enterprise-grade speed, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the clear winner. However, for applications requiring real-time, human-like voice and vision interaction, GPT-4o remains untouchable.