Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-o1
Compare two of the most advanced AI models available today. Find out which one suits your needs better.
Quick Overview
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
by Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is Anthropic's fastest and most cost-effective model, outperforming their previous top-tier model, Opus, on many benchmarks. It's designed for high-throughput enterprise workloads.
Modalities
Best For
Code generation, data analysis, content creation, and enterprise-scale AI applications.
GPT-o1
by OpenAI
GPT-o1 is OpenAI's first 'reasoning' model, trained to think before it speaks. It excels at complex math, science, and coding problems where step-by-step logic is required.
Modalities
Best For
Scientific research, complex algorithm design, advanced mathematical problem solving.
Performance Benchmarks
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)
GPQA (Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A)
HumanEval (Code Generation)
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | GPT-o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 200k tokens | 128k tokens |
| Real-time Voice | ||
| Interactive Code Artifacts | ||
| Open Source | ||
| API Cost (Input) | $3/1M tokens | $15/1M tokens |
| API Cost (Output) | $15/1M tokens | $60/1M tokens |
Strengths & Weaknesses
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Strengths
- •Top-tier intelligence at high speed
- •Excellent for coding and technical tasks
- •Large 200K context window
- •Cost-effective for its performance level
Weaknesses
- •Fewer multimodal features compared to GPT-4o (no audio/video)
- •Less known brand name compared to OpenAI's GPT
GPT-o1
Strengths
- •Exceptional reasoning and logic capabilities
- •Superior performance in math and hard sciences
- •Reduces hallucinations by 'thinking' through steps
- •Best-in-class coding generation
Weaknesses
- •Slower response time due to 'thinking' phase
- •More expensive than standard models
- •Currently text-only (preview)
What Users Are Saying
Claude 3.5 Sonnet Users
“Developers and businesses praise Sonnet 3.5 for its incredible speed and intelligence, particularly in coding and complex reasoning tasks. Its 'Artifacts' feature for interactive code execution is a standout.”
GPT-o1 Users
“Researchers and coders find GPT-o1 significantly better at solving hard problems than previous models, though its slower inference time makes it less suitable for casual chat.”
Final Verdict
Claude 3.5 Sonnet balances speed and high intelligence beautifully. GPT-o1 trades that speed for superior reasoning capabilities in complex logical deduction and advanced mathematics.